![]() ![]() The finalists in the Army's Phase IV camouflage testing were: Crye Precision ADS Inc. In 2010, the United States Army Camouflage Improvement Effort considered 22 entrants. The Army eliminated unwanted patterns down to four finalists and the Scorpion W2 was not among them. This version was also the fifth finalist submission to Phase IV but was later withdrawn from the race due to other patterns outperforming it. It set out to push towards a worldwide solution, but because of the much more extensive testing needed for that to be achieved the program would require much more time. Initializing of Phase IV began shortly after Phase III. Option to restrict the pattern to service members only.Ĭombined with the effectiveness of the now tested MultiCam (Operation Enduring Freedom Camouflage Pattern or OEF-CP), the Army announced Scorpion W2 was selected as the operational camouflage pattern - OCP in 2015.US Army owns the licensing rights for Scorpion W2.If it’s not clear what that actually means: The original Scorpion pattern was modified by the United States Army Natick Soldier Research in 2009 and named the Scorpion W2 pattern. However, the original Scorpion pattern was already owned in 2002 and under a government contract. The first pattern choice was the MultiCam pattern, but complications rose allegedly because of the “printing fees” from the side of Crye Precision, which was obtained prior to the 2014 NDA act. Through Phase I - III of the search for the new camouflage pattern to be used in Afghanistan and other Middle East regions. In these initial phases, Crye developed and presented the original Scorpion pattern. In early 2002, Crye Precision pushed forward in the race for the next generation of OCP and combat uniforms but faced initial setbacks from the US improvement program. The Objective Force Warrior program brought a revelation of the US Army which concluded that Universal Camouflage Pattern did not adequately meet the concealment needs of camouflage uniforms for soldiers deploying to Afghanistan. Scorpion W2 is the independently developed version from the US Natick Soldier Research. MultiCam is the pattern developed by Crye Precision suitable for commercial use. Seeing similarities is not just some elaborate play of the eyes, but instead stems from the fact that the patterns both have the same predecessor - Scorpion. In the side-by-side comparison above you can see the highlighted vertical elements on the MultiCam pattern (left) and none present on the Scorpion W2 (right).Įven if you are not a camouflage expert you can clearly see the difference if you compare the two patterns, but when seeing just the Scorpion W2 standalone you could easily mistake it for MultiCam or vice versa. When comparing them side by side you immediately notice the darker shades of Scorpion W2 and to the keen eye another key difference pops out immediately MultiCam has clear vertical elements that are not present in Scorpion W2. However, we intentionally avoided mentioning Scorpion W2 which was for the purpose of that post suitable to be left out, as the topic tends to get confusing to someone who has not dug deeper into the topic or operators that are not familiar with each. We have already talked about the effectiveness of MultiCam and touched the extremely competitive nature of selecting the next Operational Camouflage Pattern for the U.S. In this blog post we expand on the differences, the development and answer the most common questions about this topic. Multicam, Scorpion W2 and OCP are used so interchangeably that you can get easily confused and lost in the topic if you are not familiar with it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |